Saturday, May 16, 2009

The Zionist corruption of Medicine, and the Science and Politics of Cancer

One of my major complaints from medical school was that we were never taught nutrition. Sure, we were told that an active lifestyle and healthy eating habits were needed to maintain a healthy constitution, but we were never taught anything but allopathic medicine(the standard western model). But it wasn't always that way, there was a time when American doctors had the freedom to utilize all possible ways to approach disease. That all changed in 1910 with the Flexner Report.
The Flexner report "reformed" the study of medicine in the U.S. and Canada. Its author, Abraham Flexnor was a prominent Zionist with no medical credentials whatsoever yet with funding from Carnegie and Rockefeller brought about the birth of the corrupt modern day medical establishment. I would go as far as say that many MD's are little more then glorified prescription writers. The fine details are included in "Murder by Injection"(currently out of print but you can download it here)

Frederick T. Gates' first present to Rockefeller was a plan to dominate the entire medical education system in the United States. The initial step was taken by the organization of the Rockefeller Institute of Medical Research. In 1907, the AMA "requested" the Carnegie Foundation to conduct a survey of all the medical schools of the nation. Even at this early date, the Rockefeller interests had already achieved substantial working control of the Carnegie Foundations which has been maintained ever since. It is well known in the foundation world that the Camegie Foundations (there are several), are merely feeble adjuncts of the Rockefeller Foundation. The Carnegie Foundation named one Abraham Flexner to head up its study of medical schools. Coincidentally, his brother Simon was the head of the Rockefeller Institute of Medical Research. The Flexner Report was completed in 1910, after many months of travel and study. It was heavily influenced by the German-trained allopathic representation in the American medical profession. It was later revealed that the primary influence on Flexner had been his trip to Baltimore. He had been a graduate of Johns Hopkins University. This school had been established by Daniel Coit Gilman (1831-1908). Gilman had been one of the three original incorporators of the Russell Trust at Yale University (now known as the Brotherhood of Death). Its Yale headquarters had a letter in German authorizing Gilman to set up this branch of the Illuminati in the United States. Gilman incorporated the Peabody Fund and the John Slater Fund, which later became the Rockefeller Foundation. Gilman also became an original incorporator of Rockefeller's General Education Board, which was to take over the United States system of medical education; the Carnegie Foundation and the Russell Sage Foundation. At Johns Hopkins University. Gilman also taught Richard Ely, who became the evil genius of Woodrow Wilson's education. Gilman's final achievement in the last year of his life was to advise Herbert Hoover on the advisability of setting up a think tank. Hoover later followed Gilman's plan in setting up the Hoover Institution after the First World War. This institution furnished the movers and shapers of the "Reagan Revolution" in Washington. Not surprisingly, the American people found themselves saddled with even more debt and an even more oppressive federal bureaucracy, all the result of Daniel Coit Gilman's Illuminati prospectus.

Flexner spent much of his time at Johns Hopkins University finalizing his report. The medical school, which had only been established in 1893, was considered to be very up-todate. It was also the headquarters of the German allopathic school of medicine in the United States. Flexner, born in Louisville, Ky., had studied at the University of Berlin. The president of the Zionist Organization of America, Louis Brandeis, also from Louisville, was an old friend of the Flexner family. After Woodrow Wilson appointed Brandeis to the Supreme Court, Brandeis appointed himself a delegate to Paris to attend the Versailles Peace Conference in 1918. His purpose was to advance the goals of the Zionist movement at this conference. Bernard Flexner, who was then an attorney in New York, was asked to accompany Brandeis as the official legal counsel to the Zionist delegation in Pads. Bernard Flexner later became a founding member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and a trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation with his brother Simon.

Simon Flexner had been appointed the first director of the Rockefeller Institute of Medical Research at its organization in 1903. Abraham Flexner joined the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching in 1908, serving there until his retirement in 1928. He also served for years as a member of Rockefeller's General Education Board. He was awarded a Rhodes Memorial lectureship at Oxford University. His definitive work was published in 1913, "Prostitution in Europe."

Abraham Flexner submitted a final report to Rockefeller which apparently was satisfactory in every way. Its first point was an emphatic agreement with the AMA's lament that there were too many doctors. The Flexner solution was a simple one; to make medical education so elitist and expensive, and so drawn out, that most students would be prohibited from even considering a medical career. The Flexner program set up requirements for four years of undergraduate college, and a further four years of medical school. His report also set up complex requirements for the medical schools; they must have expensive laboratories and other equipment. As the requirements of the Flexner Report became effective, the number of medical schools was rapidly reduced. By the end of World War I, the number of medical schools had been reduced from 650 to a mere 50 in number. The number of annual graduates had been reduced from 7500 to 2500. The enactment of the Flexner restrictions virtually guaranteed that the Medical Monopoly in the United States would result in a small group of elitist students from well to do families, and that this small group would be subjected to intense controls.

What has the Flexner Report cost the average American citizen ? Some recent statistics throw light on the situation. The New York Times reported that in 1985, the cost of health care per person in the United States was $1800 per year; in England, $800 per year; in Japan, $600 per year. Yet both England and Japan rank higher on the scale of quality of medical care than the United States. Compared to Japan, for instance, which has a higher living standard than the United States, but which furnished its citizens with quality medical care for $600 per person each year, comparative medical care in the United States cannot be valued higher than $500 per year per person. What is the $1300 per person difference ? It is the $300 billion per year looting of the American public by the Medical Monopoly, in overcharges, criminal syndicalist activities, and the operations of the Drug Trust.

...and that's just the tip of the ice berg. Did I mention that they purposefully repress and discourage any alternative approach or explanation? Bottom line : If it's not profitable its not going to make the cut.

As for the science and politics of cancer, check out the following :



How's that for starters? Fascinating isn't it?

7 comments:

lwtc247 said...

Assalamualaikum Dr. Maxtor.

Thanks for that. I've used this as a basis for post on my wordpress blog.

http://lwtc247.wordpress.com


Somne more info:

Amygdalin (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amygdalin)

The Science and Politics of Cancer (2005) - Part 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPtKz5WecOk

The Science and Politics of Cancer (2005) - Part 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iq9VW671euI

The Science and Politics of Cancer (2005) - Part 6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weo1bznKsQA

The Science and Politics of Cancer (2005) - Part 7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFIJEX-U44c

The Science and Politics of Cancer (2005) - Part 8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWruCB9CbuA


The Science and Politics of Cancer (2005) - Part 9
(advert for books and brief bio) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9-z5Tvv9aA

DrMaxtor said...

Waliakum Asalam, lwtc247!

Thanks for the links. I will be adding your awesome blog to blogroll inshallah.

gess said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
gess said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
gufran said...

Assalamualaikum,

Jazakallah for the post interesting videos helped me a lot.

lwtc247 said...

Salam Dr M.

Relevant to your article here, I found this...
100_Years_Medical_Fascism.pdf
(http://tinyurl.com/255rc85)
on
http://futurefastforward.com/

Pity the references are missing.

Wassalam.

Alex Tessier said...

Though Laetrile isn't easy to come by for most people, particularly outside of the U.S., it is possible to have a therapeutic dose of amygdalin through the use of apricot kernels.

There is a very broad range of apricot kernels available that encompass the entire spectrum of amygdalin content - from very little, to quite a lot. The bitterness of an apricot kernel is indicative of its amygdalin content. Both sweet and bitter varieties contain quantities of amygdalin. However, people don’t realize the significant range of amygdalin content of the apricot kernels being sold as “bitter” varieties.

45 apricot kernels of one variety are all that is required for a daily dose of 1,500 mg of amygdalin. This is a dose that falls within a therapeutic range. In another variety of “bitter” apricot kernels, 200 kernels would have to be consumed in order to achieve similar quantities. However, the people using this variety are still adhering to common dosage guidelines, which means, at best, they’re likely only receiving 80-100 mg of amygdalin, and that’s at 45 apricot kernels per day.

The variety of bitter apricot kernel is critical to their efficacy. The wrong variety will simply not work.

I talk about this in more detail on my own blog at http://apricot-kernels.blogspot.com.au/2012/02/apricot-kernels-some-work-some-dont.html